|
Marine Parks Visitor Liaison Group
Notes of Meeting on 11th Meeting held on 17 April 2004
2:30 p.m. in Sai Kung Country Park Visitor Centre
Download : Notes of Meeting 
Participants
Mr. CHAN Benny Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mr. CHAN Lin-cheung General Public
Mr. CHAN Yat-fong Tourist Guide
Mr. CHU Clarus World Wide Fund For Nature Hong Kong
Mr. HODGSON Paul Divers
Mr. KONG Chun-choi Hoi Ha Village Representative
Mr. LAU Yu-on Student
Mr. NEWBERY David Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mrs. NEWBERY Nicola Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mr. NG Kon-sing Tourist Guide
Mr. TONG Albert Hoi Ha Village Resident
Ms. TONG Lily Hoi Ha Village Resident
Ms. WONG, Siu-yuk Tourist Guide
Mr. YUNG Ching-wan Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mr. YUNG Hoi-yeung Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mr. YUNG Koon-fat Hoi Ha Village Resident
Mr. YUNG Wong-fat Hoi Ha Village Representative
Ms. YUNG YUNG Pak-yung Hoi Ha Village Resident
AFCD
Dr. WONG Fook-yee Chairman
Mr. WONG Edward Marine Parks Division, AFCD
Mr. KWOK Alex Marine Parks Division, AFCD
Mr. MOK Dennis Country Parks Division, AFCD
Mr. Patrick LAU Secretary
Other Government Departments
Mr. LEE Wai-ming Aaron Hong Kong Police Force, Sai Kung
1. Opening remarks
1. Opening Remarks
The Chairman welcomed all participants to the meeting of the 11th Marine
Parks Visitor Liaison Group. Participants introduced themselves and their
interest.
2. Progress of Marine Parks Programme
2.1 Tung Ping Chau Marine Park
Ć The tourism development at Tung Ping Chau Marine Park mentioned by
Secretary of Treasury is still under investigation by Commissioner for
Tourism. No further information is available on this aspect at this moment.
2.2 Hoi Ha Wan Marine Park
2.2.1. Hoi Ha Wan New Zoning Plan
Ć Three Mechanized Vessel Prohibited Zones (MVPZ) in Hoi Ha Wan Marine
Park were gazetted in January 2004 to separate vessels from swimmers and
divers as a safety measure.
Ć Some Hoi Ha villagers expressed that the MVPZs resulted in inconvenience
on their livelihood especially when they need to transport heavy or bulky
goods by sea. They claimed that it is difficult for them to paddle a long
distance under such circumstances. Some villagers suggested building a
new jetty that extends outside the MVPZ located along the main beach.
ƒÜ In response to villager¡¦s concerns, AFCD agreed to gather more information
from the villagers and to consider alternative arrangements to alleviate
the impacts on them.
2.2.2 Coral viewing activities
Ć There was a query on the legality of carrying out coral watching activity
in Hoi Ha Wan Marine Park. Although the Marine Parks and Marine Reserves
Regulation prescribed that all commercial activities carried out inside
marine parks must apply for a permit from the Authority, enforcement on
this regulation is in fact difficult since the business deal mostly occur
outside the marine park. It was also difficult to distinguish the commercial
vessels from private pleasure crafts entering into marine parks.
Ć AFCD had carried out enforcement actions with Marine Police and Marine
Department on sampans taking passengers illegally in Hoi Ha Wan Marine
Park. Marine Department prosecuted the sampans under the Shipping and
Port Control Ordinance.
Ć In view of the fact that large vessels were used in Marine Parks for
coral viewing, AFCD will work closely with Marine Department to investigate
ways to control this type of boat activity to avoid the threats on corals.
Although there was suggestion to limit the size of boat entering into
marine parks, it was impractical, as vessel moving within marine parks
is not prohibited under the legislation. Some marine parks such as Sha
Chau and Lung Kwu Chau, is part of a navigation route used by large vessels
frequently.
2.2.2. Fishing activities
Participants requested to clarify the criteria of issuing fishing permit.
The Chairman responded that fishermen were screened and certified by their
corresponding fishermen association their fishermen¡¦s status and their
fishing history in marine parks. Fishermen who traditionally fished inside
the corresponding marine parks before the designation would be granted
a permit.
Ć Some participants suggested to educate the commercial fishermen not
to use fish nets inside marine parks. WWF also indicated their intention
to organizing workshops for fishermen but their application for funding
was not successful.
Ć Some participants opined that there was a decline in fisheries resources
within Hoi Ha Wan Marine Park and this might be due to illegal fishing
activities outside AFCD patrol hours, or the number of permitted fishermen
was too high. The Chairmen responded that AFCD patrol was conducted on
an irregular-hour basis in order that illegal fishers could not predict
our patrol pattern. He also mentioned that the fishing permit numbers
are declining that implied fishing effort inside the marine park was decreasing.
Ć There was concern on the use of gill net which resulted in ghost net
problems that kill corals and many other marine lives. Participants suggested
to educate fishermen on the ghost net problem through public seminars,
and involving fishermen in ghost net clean up exercises. In addition,
it was also suggested that fishermen permit holders should put labels
on the net and report any entangled net to the Authority for further actions.
Ć The Chairman responded that AFCD would consider the suggestions and
to examine their feasibility and if necessary will consult the Marine
Parks Committee of the Country and Marine Parks Board.
2.2.4 Alternative footpath
Ć AFCD had surveyed and investigated on the feasibility of constructing
a bypass from Hoi Ha Road to the WWF Marine Life Centre bypassing the
Hoi Ha Village. It was found that the proposed trail would cut through
2 streams and a lot of boulders along the uphill which has major engineering
difficulties. AFCD would continue to explore other alternatives.
2.2.5 Tourist nuisance
Ć It was commented that although AFCD put a great afford to advise the
visitors not to disturb the villagers at Hoi Ha Wan, irresponsible tourist
guides continued to use loudhailers and visitors peeping into village
houses. In response, AFCD would invite more tourist guides and the travel
agencies representatives to attend the seminars on responsible tourism.
Village representatives would also be invited to share their experience
on tourist nuisance from the local tours. Information would also passed
to Tourism Commission for their reference take further follow-up educations
and actions where necessary.
2.2.6 Other Hoi Ha Wan issue
Ć The Hoi Ha Villagers requested the police to increase the patrol at
Hoi Ha Road and to inspect the vehicle permits on coming summer holiday.
The police undertook to consider the request.
Ć Some participants expressed that the Government should consider the
development of Hoi Ha area holistically, including car parking space,
toilets, and other infrastructure, before promoting the area as a tourist
spot. The Chairman responded that AFCD would continue to bid for resources
to convert the existing picnic site into a Visitor Centre with coach drop
off and toilet facilities.
2.3 Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park
Ć There was an enquiry on the plan to repair the trail on Sha Chau. However,
no information from DO/Tuen Mun on the schedule of repairing the trail.
2.4 Marine Parks Education Programme
ƒÜ There were 3 Teachers¡¦ Workshops organized this year at Hong Kong Central
Library for secondary schools teachers. The topics of the 3 workshops
include rocky shore ecology in Tung Ping Chau Marine Park, Marine Mammals
in Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park and Mudflat fauna and flora
in Yan Chau Tong Marine Park.
Ć Marine Parks and Marine Ecology Public Seminars would be held from
26 June 2004 to 17 July 2004 this year at Hong Kong Cultural Centre. There
would be total 9 seminars this year which include seminars on both Artificial
Reef inside marine parks and Introduction to marine food fishes. The details
of the seminars would be uploaded on AFCD¡¦s website soon.
3. Any other business
Ć One participant said that the opening hours of the toilet at Tai Miu
was inadequate and would like AFCD to convey the message to relevant departments.
Ć Some participants asked the police to establish permanent patrol post
at the Pak Tam Chung Barrier Gate. Police representative responded that
inconsideration of the effective deployment of resources, to establish
a permanent police post at Pak Tam Chung would not be possible.
Ć The participants requested representatives from other departments including
District Office (Tai Po) and Marine Department to attend MPVLG meetings.
Ć One participant suggested to issue an agenda before MPVLG meeting.
The Chairman responded that as the items were determined mainly by the
participants, it would be difficult to draw up a detailed agenda before
the meeting, but a brief one is possible.
Ć There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 5:25pm.
Viewing
MS Word file format can be done through the use of the Microsoft (R) Word
(R) software.
|